Page County’s public lands must be used for public good

Letter

Dear Editor:

Fifteen years ago, Page County purchased 50 acres near Stanley for industrial development, paying well above market rates. They bought the land despite citizens’ warning about the site’s unsuitability for industrial purposes. The result – no jobs created. Not one.

Fast-forward to today: after private discussions with a developer, county officials are rushing to sell.

First, the Economic Development Authority has conducted no public deliberations about maximizing this land’s value to county residents. There has not been a public hearing. All discussions have occurred behind closed doors in executive session.

Second, there is no evidence that there has been any consideration of much needed affordable housing for Page County’s working families. Instead, the likely outcome is high-end vacation homes and short-term rental properties that we cannot afford and that primarily benefit outside investors.

Third, the sale process raises concerns. No minimum bid has been established. The property hasn’t been listed through commercial real estate networks that might attract competitive offers. Advertisement on-line has been limited to the bare legal minimum — a single notice in the Page Valley News. These decisions virtually guarantee a below-market sale price.

This is public land. Demand a transparent process that helps solve Page County’s number one problem — affordable housing for the people who live and work here.

Call County Administrator Amity Moler at 540-743-4142.

Tom Merton ~ Page County, Virginia

•••

PageValleyNews.com offers an open forum for the public in its LETTERS section. We encourage letters of local interest by those who live in Page County, Va.; however, we welcome all letters on all subjects from all readers. PVN reserves the right to publish letters at its discretion.

SUBMIT LETTERS TO: publisher@pagevalleynews.com

•••

PREVIOUS LETTERS

Why is Todd Gilbert in Page County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office?

Kauffman-Coffman family reunion celebrates 300 years of heritage

Why did Todd Gilbert resign?

Community Works 4Page celebrated 2nd anniversary with Volunteer Appreciation Day

Page One uses all donations to help those in need

Commentary on the HD33 selection

Postal Service says ‘Delivering for America’ sets up USPS for long-term success

American Legion needs help removing sign

Page One is here to help

Foster family of 13 needs help rebuilding after fire

‘No one is denied food assistance at Page One’

Local leaders need to impose codes and standards to protect infrastructure from increasing weather

Community Works 4Page and Friends of the Shenandoah River planning two clean-ups

Measles outbreak highlights need for vaccination

Page One thanks those who have helped those in need in Page County

Threats to cut Medicaid and Social Security ‘stomach-churning and frightening’

Stop the Steal by Elon Musk

Update on Community Works 4Page

What will the sheriff do with illegal immigrants?

Top Post Ad

1 Comment

  1. In 2023, the EDA requested that the land be rezoned to agriculture to pave the way for selling to a developer. The land would then be divided into smaller parcels with luxury housing to avoid the requirements for subdivisions.

    The BOS denied the request and, particularly Allan Lauderback and Keith Guzy (running for reelection now) asked for more into about why it couldn’t be turned into workforce housing. He also noted that since the BOS had originally purchased the land, the county should decide what happens to it.

    The EDA cited enormous expense associated with workforce residential development, but Mr Guzy called the engineering company and learned that the high cost for development quoted included many items that were not required. So it looks like the EDA was not really interested in workforce housing

    The EDA was urged to submit a grant for a study for workforce housing.

    No further discussion occurred

    In Feb 2025, the EDA minutes note that an offer was made to purchase the property but provided no details

    In July, EDA meeting minutes show that a developer expressed interest in the purchase. The EDA contacted their bond attorney, Daniel
    Lauro, for guidance on advertising the sale

    This apparently was done in a closed session

    The property is now advertised for sale with plans to be submitted by 9/18

    Sounds like they want it to be vacation homes or short term rentals for the very wealthy.

    The EDA, it seems , is looking out only for the very rich. We deserve better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*